Token Autopsy · Sample report
Agency (AGENCY)
Mint: 7VertkgF9KLhxxJXHX6uaWuoYZTP9LdGj2bWmVXVpump · Generated by an AI agent · 2026-10-04 13:08 UTC · Token age ≈ 3.5 days
24h volume (all pools)
$24.1M
The one-paragraph read
Agency is a 3-day-old pump.fun graduate that has run ~143x from its earliest recorded price and is now showing classic distribution behavior: over the last 24 hours ~16,800 more SOL flowed out to sellers than in from buyers, while price still printed +535% — meaning early, low-cost holders are selling into a fresh wave of late buyers. Volume ($24M/24h) is ~43x the liquidity backing the main pool ($556K), which is extremely high and typical of tokens in a churn phase. Structure is clean (no mint/freeze authority, decently sized pools), but the flow picture says momentum is being harvested, not built.
Structure & token facts
- Mint authority: none — supply cannot be inflated. Freeze authority: none.
- Program: Token-2022 (extensions enabled; no harmful extensions observed in the mint account).
- Supply: 960.76M tokens (6 decimals). Full supply is circulating — no vault escrow detected.
- Metadata: IPFS-hosted URI, image on IPFS, no external website/twitter/telegram fields filled. The project has no verifiable public presence from metadata alone.
- Pools: main liquidity on PumpSwap (~$556K), plus a Meteora pool ~$972K and ~$321K, several small satellite pools ($175–$84K) — the satellites are too thin to matter for real size.
Holder concentration
Top-10 holders control ~24.5% of supply; top-20 control ~35.2%. The single largest holder (~10% of supply, 2gEcxVDo…A4) is almost certainly the main PumpSwap pool — this is normal and expected. The next tier (1.3–2% each) is where the real distribution risk sits: a handful of wallets each holding several hundred thousand dollars of a token whose entire main-pool liquidity is ~$556K.
Translation: it takes roughly 2–3 of the mid-sized top-20 wallets selling everything to drain a meaningful fraction of the main pool.
Trading patterns (last 24h)
- Trade count: ~130K trades across ~22,300 unique traders — very high retail churn.
- Net flow: −16,782 SOL net selling (buys $121.4K-vol-weighted vs sells $138.2K). Sellers are winning the tape despite the up-trending chart.
- Short-term: 12h window had +38.7%, then −34.5% over 4h and −7.5% over the last hour — a wave peaked and is rolling over.
- Volume-to-liquidity: ~43x on 24h volume/liquidity — churn far exceeds the capital actually backing exits. This is the single loudest risk number in the report.
Risk flags
Volume 43× liquidity
Net selling into strength (−16.8K SOL/24h)
Price −34.5% in 4h
Top-20 hold ~35% of supply
No socials in metadata
3 days old
No mint authority
No freeze authority
What kind of situation this is
A hyper-churned momentum token in its distribution phase. The structural hygiene is above-average for a pump.fun launch (no authorities, real multi-pool liquidity), but the economics are simple: a small group of wallets that bought near the bottom is now supplying the market, and the $556K main pool cannot absorb a coordinated exit from the top-20 (35% of supply ≈ $5.5M at current FDV) without collapse. Any new entry is effectively buying a position behind those sellers.
Data, not advice. This is an automated summary of public on-chain data at generation time. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any asset, and it can be wrong or incomplete. Never risk more than you can afford to lose.